IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v98y2017i4p1175-1188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

They Chose to Go to the Moon: How Birth Cohorts Shape Opinions on Funding for Space Exploration

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher D. DeSante

Abstract

Objective Oftentimes, political scientists wish to measure how attitudes or behaviors have changed from one generation to the next. One obstacle to this analysis is that certain attitudinal and behavioral variables (e.g., political participation or policy preferences) correlate with the age of the respondent. In seeking to model both age†and cohort†based changes in attitudes, researchers are left having to impose constraints within the generalized linear model framework to solve problems of underidentification. Methods This article uses a method that has been developed to work around this exact problem: the intrinsic estimator. Results By using this approach to traditional age†period†cohort (APC) models, the IE is one solution to underidentified models of political change. Conclusions This article summarizes the identification problem in APC methodology and then illustrates the advantages of the IE to the traditionally used constrained generalized linear modeling (CGLIM) approach with specific applications to trends in American political attitudes regarding spending on space exploration.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher D. DeSante, 2017. "They Chose to Go to the Moon: How Birth Cohorts Shape Opinions on Funding for Space Exploration," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 98(4), pages 1175-1188, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:98:y:2017:i:4:p:1175-1188
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12470
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12470?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:98:y:2017:i:4:p:1175-1188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.