IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v85y2004i2p463-477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Living in the Moment: Lags, Leads, and the Link Between Legislative Agendas and Interest Advocacy

Author

Listed:
  • David Lowery
  • Virginia Gray
  • Matthew Fellowes
  • Jennifer Anderson

Abstract

Objectives. Based on sharply divergent interpretations about the nature of the politics of organized interests, three competing perspectives imply that organized interests variously lead, lag, or are contemporaneous with legislative agendas. Methods. We contribute to this debate by presenting data using a short‐term timeframe to assess the sequence of the relationship between legislative agendas and lobbying activity; we examine the lags and leads in the relationship between legislative agendas in 1995, 1997, and 1999 and the density of state lobbying communities in 1997 using Gray and Lowery's (1996) energy, stability, area (ESA) model of interest system density. Results. The analysis provides little support for the lagging and leading hypotheses and strong support for the contemporaneous hypothesis. Conclusions. Although this analysis will not end all debates over the sequential relationship between legislative agendas and lobbying activity, it suggests that legislative agenda and interest system density are largely governed by within‐session dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • David Lowery & Virginia Gray & Matthew Fellowes & Jennifer Anderson, 2004. "Living in the Moment: Lags, Leads, and the Link Between Legislative Agendas and Interest Advocacy," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 85(2), pages 463-477, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:85:y:2004:i:2:p:463-477
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08502014.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08502014.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08502014.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lowery David & Gray Virginia & Cluverius John, 2013. "Economic change and the supply of interest representation in the American States," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 33-61, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:85:y:2004:i:2:p:463-477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.