IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i2ne70010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stories From the Trenches: The Difference Disability Makes in the Campaign Experiences of Candidates With Disabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Sally Friedman
  • Richard K. Scotch

Abstract

Objective Persons with disabilities are a large and significant segment of the American public, yet Americans with disabilities are only beginning to be considered as political candidates or officeholders. Methods This paper reports on in‐depth interviews with 21 individuals with physical disabilities who have stood for office in recent election cycles. The interviews focused on candidates’ reasons for running, their campaign experiences, and how their disabilities affected their campaigns. Results Findings show multiple reasons for their candidacies while demonstrating similar obstacles as those faced by other “marginalized” groups. Respondents also reported surprisingly positive aspects of campaigning with a disability. Conclusion The work has implications for some tried‐and‐true political science concepts characterizing the situation of other under‐represented groups: descriptive and substantive representation, the importance of developing an eligible pool of potential candidates, and contextual factors showing the importance of variation as well as commonalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Sally Friedman & Richard K. Scotch, 2025. "Stories From the Trenches: The Difference Disability Makes in the Campaign Experiences of Candidates With Disabilities," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:2:n:e70010
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70010
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:2:n:e70010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.