IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i2ne70002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Friend or Foe? Partisanship, Rivalry, and Overseas Foreign Direct Investment in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Glen Biglaiser
  • Kelan (Lilly) Lu
  • Seong Hun Yoo

Abstract

Objective This article revisits how political partisanship and home and host‐state relations affect foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows. Method We use panel data for overseas Chinese and South Korean FDI into the United States from as early as 2006 to 2022. Results We observe differences in Chinese and South Korean FDI, finding that Chinese firms prefer Republican‐governed states because of the lower economic costs and higher political safety sought by rival countries. Conversely, South Korean firms favor investing in states with divided governments since both Democrats and Republicans will want to take credit for the job creation from a U.S. ally, offering greater financial incentives to South Korean businesses. Divided governments also increase policy stability, benefitting South Korean firms. We also conduct robustness checks and assess the politics of the FDI mode of entry, and the results confirm our main findings. Conclusion Our study offers nuance into how partisanship and foreign relations between home and host states affect political risk and FDI.

Suggested Citation

  • Glen Biglaiser & Kelan (Lilly) Lu & Seong Hun Yoo, 2025. "Friend or Foe? Partisanship, Rivalry, and Overseas Foreign Direct Investment in the United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(2), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:2:n:e70002
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:2:n:e70002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.