IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i2ne70001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political Origin of High Trust in the Government During the COVID‐19 Pandemic: Selective Responsibility Attribution to Opposition Parties and Nonpartisan Experts

Author

Listed:
  • Tatsuya Iseki
  • Masaki Hata

Abstract

Objective Increased public trust in government and political leaders during the COVID‐19 pandemic in various countries coexisted with a mounting backlash against pandemic‐control measures. To clarify this paradox of high trust alongside resistance to control measures, we show that amid the cross‐partisan consensus and increased roles for experts during the pandemic, blame for pandemic‐control measures were attributed to opposition parties and/or nonpartisan experts instead of governing incumbents. Consequently, the backlash against such measures did not erode public trust in governments and political leaders. Methods Utilizing survey data collected in Japan in 2020, we examined the public response to a de facto stay‐at‐home order and evaluated public trust in the incumbent party, opposition party, and advisory experts in Japan. Results Among governing‐party supporters and independents, dissatisfaction with the stay‐at‐home order did not decrease trust in the incumbent party but did decrease trust in the opposition party and in advisory experts. Conclusion One reason why public trust in the government remained high during the pandemic is that individuals’ responsibility attribution was biased. The government must clarify the distribution of roles and responsibilities during crises such as pandemics.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatsuya Iseki & Masaki Hata, 2025. "Political Origin of High Trust in the Government During the COVID‐19 Pandemic: Selective Responsibility Attribution to Opposition Parties and Nonpartisan Experts," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:2:n:e70001
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70001
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:2:n:e70001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.