IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i2ne13496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Panethnic Fate Unlinked: Who Finds the Term “Chinese Virus” Acceptable?

Author

Listed:
  • Duy Trinh
  • Milkie Vu

Abstract

Objective We explain why some immigrants tolerate or even support discrimination against members of their own panethnic groups. We propose that such attitudes are shaped by an individual's acculturation to both their origin and host cultures. Specifically, acculturation affects susceptibility to discrimination faced by panethnic in‐groups and moderates beliefs in panethnic‐linked fate and solidarity. Methods We conducted an original survey of Vietnamese immigrants in the United States during a surge in anti‐Chinese discrimination. The survey assessed perceptions of the discriminatory term “Chinese virus,” focusing on variations in cultural identity and language use as dimensions of acculturation. Results Respondents with stronger Vietnamese and weaker American acculturation in internal dimensions, such as cultural identity, were more likely to reject the term. Conversely, higher Vietnamese acculturation in external dimensions, such as language use, correlated with greater tolerance of the term. Meanwhile, experiencing discrimination had no significant effect. The findings are robust to alternate model specifications and controls for demographics, nativity, socioeconomic status, partisanship, social support, and negative experiences with the COVID‐19 pandemic. Conclusion Our findings highlight the complex ways in which acculturation shapes immigrant attitudes toward ethnically charged discrimination, with important implications for understanding panethnic solidarity and responses to prejudice.

Suggested Citation

  • Duy Trinh & Milkie Vu, 2025. "Panethnic Fate Unlinked: Who Finds the Term “Chinese Virus” Acceptable?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:2:n:e13496
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13496
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13496?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:2:n:e13496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.