IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i2ne13481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Believes in the “Great Replacement”? Political Attitudes and Democratic Alienation Among Supporters of Immigration‐Related Conspiracy Theories in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Maik Herold

Abstract

Objective This paper investigates how belief in the Great Replacement myth (GRM) is associated with individual political attitudes, ideological positions, and indicators of political alienation. Method It uses original survey data that were conducted in 10 European Union countries in 2022 (n = 20,449) employing robust linear regression modeling. Results The study provides evidence that growing support for the GRM is associated with declining satisfaction with democracy and political trust, as well as increasing populist sentiments, anti‐immigration attitudes and a greater acceptance of violence as a means of politics. However, it also reveals that, in socio‐cultural terms, a majority of Great Replacement supporters hold rather liberal than conservative positions on issues such as transnational integration, gender equality, and the rights of marginalized groups, with one in ten even taking a pro‐immigration stance. Conclusion The findings have important implications for those seeking to tackle immigration‐related conspiracy beliefs and address their actual or potential supporters. They show that those who believe in the GRM are much more politically diverse than expected and that their endorsement of this narrative cannot simply be understood as the product of an extreme political ideology.

Suggested Citation

  • Maik Herold, 2025. "Who Believes in the “Great Replacement”? Political Attitudes and Democratic Alienation Among Supporters of Immigration‐Related Conspiracy Theories in Europe," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:2:n:e13481
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13481
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13481?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:2:n:e13481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.