IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i1ne13480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Political Endorsements Affect Support for Conspiracy Theories?

Author

Listed:
  • Mathieu Turgeon
  • Alessandro Freire

Abstract

Objectives This article examines how support for conspiracy theories is affected by political endorsement. By relying on the literature on partisan cues and the role of political identity (partisan or ideological) in shaping people's attitudes and behaviors, we argue that endorsement of conspiracy theories by political elites convergent (divergent) with one's political identity should increase (decrease) belief in said conspiracy theories. Methods We rely on data collected from over 10,000 respondents in Brazil to evaluate this hypothesis by embedding a wording experiment in questions tapping support for conspiracy theories. Results We find that partisans of the Workers' Party, a well‐established party with a strong base of supporters, are affected by political endorsements by showing greater (lower) support for conspiracy theories when endorsed by political elites convergent (divergent) with their political identity. Conclusion Our findings suggest that political endorsements of conspiracy theories exert similar effects as endorsements of other political issues or public policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathieu Turgeon & Alessandro Freire, 2025. "Do Political Endorsements Affect Support for Conspiracy Theories?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(1), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:1:n:e13480
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13480
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13480?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:1:n:e13480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.