IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i1ne13479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Steppe to City: Reaching Chinese and Mongolian Voices Using a Novel Survey Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Shannon C. Houck

Abstract

Objective The primary purpose of this study was to examine Chinese and Mongolian attitudes on cultural and socio‐political issues important to China–Mongolia relations across geospatial and demographic data. Method To investigate, this research leveraged Random Domain Intercept Technology (RDIT) to collect anonymous opt‐in survey responses from people in all 34 regions of China (N = 5028) and in all 21 Aimags (provinces) in Mongolia (N = 2003). Results Findings revealed significant points of tension between the two countries. Most notably, a majority of Chinese respondents expressed support for a Chinese and Russian invasion of Mongolia, while the majority of Mongolian respondents indicated a strong willingness to fight back. Conclusion This study provides novel insights from diverse voices in China and Mongolia, two understudied populations, during a critically important time for Asian geopolitics.

Suggested Citation

  • Shannon C. Houck, 2025. "From Steppe to City: Reaching Chinese and Mongolian Voices Using a Novel Survey Methodology," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(1), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:1:n:e13479
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13479
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13479?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:1:n:e13479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.