IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v105y2024i7p2269-2279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of incarceration on political beliefs for vulnerable populations

Author

Listed:
  • Hope Martinez

Abstract

Objective This article examines whether incarceration influences a change in political beliefs for those incarcerated and the extent to which it affects more vulnerable groups, including women and people of color. Method I use a series of logit models to analyze responses to the Marshall Project's 2020 prison survey. Results My analysis reveals a significant change in political beliefs since being incarcerated. There is an increased effect of changing political beliefs for women and people of color incarcerated. The effect reveals that people of color are becoming, either for the first time or further aligned, with the Republican Party since being incarcerated. Conclusion The experience of violence and abuse while incarcerated extends the tools of white supremacy in the prison system by influencing feelings of shame, hopelessness, and cultural inferiority, further aligning vulnerable groups to conservatism and whiteness. My Incapacitation theory begins to explain the change in political beliefs due to the carceral system's use of incapacitation and its long‐term effect on political behavior of incarcerated groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Hope Martinez, 2024. "The effect of incarceration on political beliefs for vulnerable populations," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(7), pages 2269-2279, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:7:p:2269-2279
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13474
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:7:p:2269-2279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.