IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v105y2024i7p2107-2121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does individualism lead to longer working hours?

Author

Listed:
  • Mevlut Tatliyer
  • Nurullah Gur

Abstract

Objective In this article, utilizing the European Social Survey (ESS), we empirically analyze the effect of individualism on working hours at the micro level. Method We use the European Social Survey (ESS), which is a biennial survey conducted in European countries. The ESS provides us five different proxies to measure individualism. In our empirical analyses, we first use proxies separately as our measure of individualism in the regressions. Second, we create a composite indicator for individualism by using the principal component analysis (PCA). We use two different methods for polychoric PCA. Results In four of our individualism proxies, we find that individualism is positively and significantly associated with working hours. Our PCA results also show that survey participants with higher individualistic attitudes tend to work longer hours. Conclusion We find robust empirical evidence that people who place greater emphasis on individualistic values have a tendency to work longer. The results show that individuals who give more importance to money, expensive things, success, recognition of achievements, showing abilities and being admired, and freedom on his/her decisions are inclined to work longer hours.

Suggested Citation

  • Mevlut Tatliyer & Nurullah Gur, 2024. "Does individualism lead to longer working hours?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(7), pages 2107-2121, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:7:p:2107-2121
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13460
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13460?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:7:p:2107-2121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.