IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v105y2024i7p2093-2106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevailing Party laws and general election outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Darren Grant

Abstract

Objective This article examines the incidence and effects of the most common ballot ordering procedure used in U.S. general elections, Prevailing Party laws, which give the most advantageous ballot position to the currently prevailing political party. Methods Panel regression and regression discontinuity analyses are applied to almost 50 years of county‐level election data from Wyoming. Results Prevailing Party laws generally increase the favored candidate's vote share by two percentage points or more, enough to flip the result of roughly 1 percent of major elections nationwide. Conclusions The effect of Prevailing Party laws is substantially larger than that of more innocuous ballot ordering schemes, due to “endorsement effects” these other schemes lack. The existing literature, which exclusively analyzes these other schemes, substantially understates the degree to which ballot order can be used to maintain political power.

Suggested Citation

  • Darren Grant, 2024. "Prevailing Party laws and general election outcomes," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(7), pages 2093-2106, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:7:p:2093-2106
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13475
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13475?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:7:p:2093-2106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.