IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v105y2024i7p2080-2092.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leading while female: Analyzing women CEOs’ post‐appointment trajectory

Author

Listed:
  • Alison Cook
  • Christy Glass
  • Alicia Ingersoll

Abstract

Objective Women leaders continue to be in the minority as corporate CEOs. Despite efforts to highlight the benefits of leadership diversity, fewer than 10 percent of CEO positions within U.S. public corporations are held by women. This study draws on the theory of gendered organizations and token theory to explore challenges women CEOs face that may inhibit their leadership trajectories and contribute to the dearth of women CEOs. We build upon and extend recent research on the leadership trajectory of women CEOs post‐appointment. Methods We test whether women CEOs have shorter tenures and heightened vulnerability to dismissal relative to men CEOs, and whether women's risk of dismissal is exacerbated by the glass cliff. Our data draw from a large sample of firms in the Russell 3000 index from 2016 to 2022. Results We find that compared to men CEOs, women enjoy shorter tenures and face a higher likelihood of being dismissed involuntarily. This gender gap in dismissal risk is further exacerbated when women are appointed during times of weak organizational performance (i.e., the “glass cliff”). Conclusion We discuss the implications of our findings for theory and practice on gender inequality in organizations and research on the glass cliff.

Suggested Citation

  • Alison Cook & Christy Glass & Alicia Ingersoll, 2024. "Leading while female: Analyzing women CEOs’ post‐appointment trajectory," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(7), pages 2080-2092, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:7:p:2080-2092
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13473
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:7:p:2080-2092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.