IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v105y2024i7p2054-2066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social disorganization theory and the college campus periphery

Author

Listed:
  • Mike Tapia
  • Erika Ochoa
  • Kelsey Cundiff

Abstract

Objective This study tests the idea that neighborhoods on the periphery of large U.S. university campuses are socially disorganized and thus higher in crime relative to those that do not border university campuses. Social disorganization theory predicts that crime in these neighborhoods is elevated due to their high rate of residential mobility, relatively low socioeconomic status, and high levels of ethnic heterogeneity. Methods To test this hypothesis, data from the National Neighborhood Crime Study 2000 were analyzed. The data set contains a representative sample of U.S. neighborhoods with variables measured at the tract level. A series of t‐tests note the difference in crime rate means for campus and non‐campus areas, and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analyses further test the hypothesis. Results We find support for the main prediction using basic social disorganization models containing composite measures plus tract and city‐level controls. Conclusion The theoretical and practical implications of this research are discussed along with the study's limitations and the potential for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Mike Tapia & Erika Ochoa & Kelsey Cundiff, 2024. "Social disorganization theory and the college campus periphery," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(7), pages 2054-2066, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:7:p:2054-2066
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13466
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:7:p:2054-2066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.