IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v102y2021i6p2640-2648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender differences in the perceptions of green spaces characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Olta Braçe
  • Marco Garrido‐Cumbrera
  • José Correa‐Fernández

Abstract

Objective Urban green spaces provide a wide range of health benefits for the population and, therefore, their use should be promoted. However, men and women perceive and value the characteristics of urban green spaces differently, as both have different sensitivities and expectations. The present study aims to identify gender differences in the perceptions of urban green spaces characteristics. Methods Gender differences in the perceptions of eleven urban green spaces characteristics were assessed, including lighting, safety, cleanliness, walking routes, bike lanes, shaded areas, recreational areas, off‐leash dog areas, children's playgrounds, drinking fountains, and pleasant views. Results Our results showed that women attribute a higher value to all the characteristics of the urban green spaces analyzed, being the most appreciated the presence of off‐leash dog areas, lighting, children's playgrounds, pleasant views, drinking fountains, safety and recreational areas. In addition, older and more educated people, unemployed women, and single men consider green spaces to be highly important. Conclusion The results of this study provide evidence for the adequate planning, design and development of urban green spaces that meet the needs of all users.

Suggested Citation

  • Olta Braçe & Marco Garrido‐Cumbrera & José Correa‐Fernández, 2021. "Gender differences in the perceptions of green spaces characteristics," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(6), pages 2640-2648, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:6:p:2640-2648
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13074
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richardson, Elizabeth A. & Mitchell, Richard, 2010. "Gender differences in relationships between urban green space and health in the United Kingdom," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 568-575, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siân de Bell & Hilary Graham & Piran C. L. White, 2020. "Evaluating Dual Ecological and Well-Being Benefits from an Urban Restoration Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-28, January.
    2. Jiang, Wenhao & Stickley, Andrew & Ueda, Michiko, 2021. "Green space and suicide mortality in Japan: An ecological study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    3. Francis, Jacinta & Wood, Lisa J. & Knuiman, Matthew & Giles-Corti, Billie, 2012. "Quality or quantity? Exploring the relationship between Public Open Space attributes and mental health in Perth, Western Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(10), pages 1570-1577.
    4. Carolina Mayen Huerta & Ariane Utomo, 2022. "Barriers Affecting Women’s Access to Urban Green Spaces during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Robert Stefko & Beata Gavurova & Viera Ivankova & Martin Rigelsky, 2020. "Gender Inequalities in Health and Their Effect on the Economic Prosperity Represented by the GDP of Selected Developed Countries—Empirical Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.
    6. Chia-Tsung Yeh & Ya-Yun Cheng & Tsai-Yun Liu, 2020. "Spatial Characteristics of Urban Green Spaces and Human Health: An Exploratory Analysis of Canonical Correlation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Zhou, Min & Tan, Shukui & Tao, Yinghui & Lu, Yongzhong & Zhang, Zuo & Zhang, Lu & Yan, Danping, 2017. "Neighborhood socioeconomics, food environment and land use determinants of public health: Isolating the relative importance for essential policy insights," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 246-253.
    8. Ben Ma & Tiantian Zhou & Shuo Lei & Yali Wen & Theint Theint Htun, 2019. "Effects of urban green spaces on residents’ well-being," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 2793-2809, December.
    9. Catharine Ward Thompson & Aldo Elizalde & Steven Cummins & Alastair H. Leyland & Willings Botha & Andrew Briggs & Sara Tilley & Eva Silveirinha de Oliveira & Jenny Roe & Peter Aspinall & Richard Mitch, 2019. "Enhancing Health Through Access to Nature: How Effective are Interventions in Woodlands in Deprived Urban Communities? A Quasi-experimental Study in Scotland, UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Mitchell, Richard, 2013. "Is physical activity in natural environments better for mental health than physical activity in other environments?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 130-134.
    11. Carolina Mayen Huerta & Gianluca Cafagna, 2021. "Snapshot of the Use of Urban Green Spaces in Mexico City during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-23, April.
    12. Katinka H. Evensen & Helena Nordh & Ramzi Hassan & Aslak Fyhri, 2021. "Testing the Effect of Hedge Height on Perceived Safety—A Landscape Design Intervention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Wenjing Wang & Tong Wu & Yuanzheng Li & Hua Zheng & Zhiyun Ouyang, 2021. "Matching Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand through Land Use Optimization: A Study of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Megacity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Luca Battisti & Filippo Corsini & Natalia Marzia Gusmerotti & Federica Larcher, 2019. "Management and Perception of Metropolitan Natura 2000 Sites: A Case Study of La Mandria Park (Turin, Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, November.
    15. Krekel, Christian & Kolbe, Jens & Wüstemann, Henry, 2016. "The greener, the happier? The effect of urban land use on residential well-being," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 117-127.
    16. Jinvo Nam & Nicola Dempsey, 2019. "Understanding Stakeholder Perceptions of Acceptability and Feasibility of Formal and Informal Planting in Sheffield’s District Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    17. Munyati, C. & Drummond, J.H., 2020. "Loss of urban green spaces in Mafikeng, South Africa," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    18. Fengrui Jing & Lin Liu & Suhong Zhou & Jiangyu Song & Linsen Wang & Hanlin Zhou & Yiwen Wang & Ruofei Ma, 2021. "Assessing the Impact of Street-View Greenery on Fear of Neighborhood Crime in Guangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Bruno Marques & Claire Freeman & Lyn Carter & Maibritt Pedersen Zari, 2021. "Conceptualising Therapeutic Environments through Culture, Indigenous Knowledge and Landscape for Health and Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    20. Akbar Rahimi & Mahsa Tarashkar & Banafshe Jahantab, 2021. "Contribution of Design Indicators in Perception of Social Capital, and Interference of Socio-Demographic Information in the Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:6:p:2640-2648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.