IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v101y2020i2p909-924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing Mechanisms: Carceral Contact and Political Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Brandon R. Davis

Abstract

Objectives This article tests two of the mechanisms—civic duty and governmental trust—through which carceral contact is theorized to be affecting political participation. This article does not examine whether criminal justice contact affects participation, but rather tests the mechanisms through which carceral contact is theorized to be affecting participation. Methods I employ the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 and the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Wave III) and utilize four different statistical analysis methods. Results I find that carceral contact has a significant direct effect and indirect effect on participation. Twenty‐one and 24 percent of the negative effect on participation is an indirect effect of carceral contact on feelings of civic duty and governmental trust, respectively. Conclusions My results strongly suggest that the causal arrow points in my hypothesized direction—carceral contact depresses levels of civic duty and governmental trust, which subsequently suppresses political participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Brandon R. Davis, 2020. "Testing Mechanisms: Carceral Contact and Political Participation," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(2), pages 909-924, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:2:p:909-924
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12755
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12755?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:2:p:909-924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.