IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v100y2019i6p2134-2147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Clinton Effect? The (Non)Impact of a High‐Profile Candidate on Gender Stereotypes

Author

Listed:
  • Mileah Kromer
  • Janine A. Parry

Abstract

Objectives Does the presence of a particular high‐profile female politician influence how citizens think about women in politics generally? Methods We randomly assigned respondents in four statewide polls either to receive a cue about Hillary Clinton followed by a battery of questions about women in politics generally, or to hear only the women in politics battery. Results Drawing on scholarship from social psychology about the role of exemplars in auto evaluation, our results indicate that most individuals still hold gendered perceptions toward women in public office, but also that pushing the Clinton button first neither diminishes nor aggravates gendered expectations broadly. This is true even among males and Republicans, whom past scholarship suggests would be most susceptible to exemplar effects, and regardless of whether respondents were primed to think about Clinton as a diplomat or a candidate. Conclusions Our findings challenge the view that specific high‐profile female politicians will influence public perception of women's leadership qualifications generally.

Suggested Citation

  • Mileah Kromer & Janine A. Parry, 2019. "The Clinton Effect? The (Non)Impact of a High‐Profile Candidate on Gender Stereotypes," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 100(6), pages 2134-2147, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:100:y:2019:i:6:p:2134-2147
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12701
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:100:y:2019:i:6:p:2134-2147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.