IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v100y2019i5p1726-1743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Quality of Governance and Trust in Government in Rural China: A Comparison Between Villagers and Officials

Author

Listed:
  • Ziqiang Han
  • Kai Lin
  • Peng Tao

Abstract

Objective This research examined the relations between perceived quality of governance and trust in government in China. Methods Using nationally representative data collected in rural China, we compared the varying degrees of trust in different levels of government (central, provincial, county, and town), and the varied effects of perceived quality of governance on trust in different levels of government between general villagers and local officials. Results This study found that although officials showed higher degrees of trust in government, they demonstrated no significant difference from the general villagers on their perceived quality of national governance. Also, the effects of perceived quality of governance on trust in most levels of government have no significant differences between local officials and villagers. Conclusion These findings were discussed in the broader contexts of economic development in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziqiang Han & Kai Lin & Peng Tao, 2019. "Perceived Quality of Governance and Trust in Government in Rural China: A Comparison Between Villagers and Officials," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 100(5), pages 1726-1743, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:100:y:2019:i:5:p:1726-1743
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12650
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12650?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jian Yang & Chaohua Dong & Yongjin Chen, 2021. "Government’s Economic Performance Fosters Trust in Government in China: Assessing the Moderating Effect of Respect for Authority," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 545-558, April.
    2. Zhang, Yang & Zhang, Kun & Liu, Congyan & Li, Fangshu & Xu, Bing, 2023. "Influence of the perceived neighborhood environment on Paying for domestic waste management services in rural China: Evidence from the Xiangtan Prefecture," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    3. Ankush Goyal & Rajender Kumar, 2022. "Does Social Welfare Programmes Influence Households Trust in Local Administration and Their Political Participation? Evidence from the MGNREG Scheme in India," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 16(3), pages 602-617, December.
    4. Qingzhi Sun & Guanyi Yin & Wei Wei & Zhan Zhang & Guanghao Li & Shenghao Zhu, 2024. "Social Network Analysis of Farmers after the Private Cooperatives’ “Intervention” in a Rural Area of China—A Case Study of the XiangX Cooperative in Shandong Province," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:100:y:2019:i:5:p:1726-1743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.