IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scjsta/v47y2020i1p156-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Degree‐based goodness‐of‐fit tests for heterogeneous random graph models: Independent and exchangeable cases

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Ouadah
  • Stéphane Robin
  • Pierre Latouche

Abstract

The degrees are a classical and relevant way to study the topology of a network. They can be used to assess the goodness of fit for a given random graph model. In this paper, we introduce goodness‐of‐fit tests for two classes of models. First, we consider the case of independent graph models such as the heterogeneous Erdös‐Rényi model in which the edges have different connection probabilities. Second, we consider a generic model for exchangeable random graphs called the W‐graph. The stochastic block model and the expected degree distribution model fall within this framework. We prove the asymptotic normality of the degree mean square under these independent and exchangeable models and derive formal tests. We study the power of the proposed tests and we prove the asymptotic normality under specific sparsity regimes. The tests are illustrated on real networks from social sciences and ecology, and their performances are assessed via a simulation study.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Ouadah & Stéphane Robin & Pierre Latouche, 2020. "Degree‐based goodness‐of‐fit tests for heterogeneous random graph models: Independent and exchangeable cases," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(1), pages 156-181, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:47:y:2020:i:1:p:156-181
    DOI: 10.1111/sjos.12410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12410
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/sjos.12410?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:47:y:2020:i:1:p:156-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0303-6898 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.