IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scjsta/v45y2018i2p217-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancements of Non†parametric Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test: Bias Correction and Dimension Reduction

Author

Listed:
  • Cuizhen Niu
  • Xu Guo
  • Lixing Zhu

Abstract

Non†parametric generalized likelihood ratio test is a popular method of model checking for regressions. However, there are two issues that may be the barriers for its powerfulness: existing bias term and curse of dimensionality. The purpose of this paper is thus twofold: a bias reduction is suggested and a dimension reduction†based adaptive†to†model enhancement is recommended to promote the power performance. The proposed test statistic still possesses the Wilks phenomenon and behaves like a test with only one covariate. Thus, it converges to its limit at a much faster rate and is much more sensitive to alternative models than the classical non†parametric generalized likelihood ratio test. As a by†product, we also prove that the bias†corrected test is more efficient than the one without bias reduction in the sense that its asymptotic variance is smaller. Simulation studies and a real data analysis are conducted to evaluate of proposed tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Cuizhen Niu & Xu Guo & Lixing Zhu, 2018. "Enhancements of Non†parametric Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test: Bias Correction and Dimension Reduction," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 45(2), pages 217-254, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:45:y:2018:i:2:p:217-254
    DOI: 10.1111/sjos.12298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12298
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/sjos.12298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:45:y:2018:i:2:p:217-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0303-6898 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.