IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scjsta/v45y2018i1p1-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Accuracy of Small P†Values In Genetic Association Studies Using Edgeworth Expansions

Author

Listed:
  • Gang Zheng
  • Jinghong Xiong
  • Qizhai Li
  • Jinfeng Xu
  • Ao Yuan
  • Joe L. Gastwirth

Abstract

The asymptotic distributions of many classical test statistics are normal. The resulting approximations are often accurate for commonly used significance levels, 0.05 or 0.01. In genome†wide association studies, however, the significance level can be as low as 1×10−7, and the accuracy of the p†values can be challenging. We study the accuracies of these small p†values are using two†term Edgeworth expansions for three commonly used test statistics in GWAS. These tests have nuisance parameters not defined under the null hypothesis but estimable. We derive results for this general form of testing statistics using Edgeworth expansions, and find that the commonly used score test, maximin efficiency robust test and the chi†squared test are second order accurate in the presence of the nuisance parameter, justifying the use of the p†values obtained from these tests in the genome†wide association studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Gang Zheng & Jinghong Xiong & Qizhai Li & Jinfeng Xu & Ao Yuan & Joe L. Gastwirth, 2018. "Evaluating the Accuracy of Small P†Values In Genetic Association Studies Using Edgeworth Expansions," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 45(1), pages 1-33, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:45:y:2018:i:1:p:1-33
    DOI: 10.1111/sjos.12283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12283
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/sjos.12283?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:45:y:2018:i:1:p:1-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0303-6898 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.