IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scjsta/v26y1999i4p493-509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Efficiency of Simple and Counter‐matched Nested Case‐control Sampling

Author

Listed:
  • Ornulf Borgan
  • Espen F. Olsen

Abstract

This paper presents a study of the performance of simple and counter‐matched nested case‐control sampling relative to a full cohort study. First we review methods for estimating the regression parameters and the integrated baseline hazard for Cox's proportional hazards model from cohort and case‐control data. Then the asymptotic distributional properties of these estimators are recapitulated, and relative efficiency results are presented both for regression and baseline hazard estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ornulf Borgan & Espen F. Olsen, 1999. "The Efficiency of Simple and Counter‐matched Nested Case‐control Sampling," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 26(4), pages 493-509, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:26:y:1999:i:4:p:493-509
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9469.00164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9469.00164
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9469.00164?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rebecca Payne & Ming Yang & Yingye Zheng & Majken K. Jensen & Tianxi Cai, 2016. "Robust risk prediction with biomarkers under two‐phase stratified cohort design," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1037-1045, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:26:y:1999:i:4:p:493-509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0303-6898 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.