IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/sajeco/v92y2024i1p80-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the gender wealth gap in South Africa using individual‐level data

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Casale
  • Adeola Oyenubi

Abstract

Despite widespread recognition that assets are important for economic wellbeing and women's empowerment, there is limited research on gender wealth gaps in either developed or developing countries. This is largely due to the lack of individual‐level data on wealth or net worth (i.e. the value of assets less debt). Most surveys that collect information on wealth do so at the household level with only one member responding on behalf of the household, even though most assets and debts are held by individuals. In this paper, we measure the gender wealth gap for South Africa using unique individual‐level data collected in the 2017 National Income Dynamics Survey, a representative household survey covering roughly 22,000 adults. We find that men and women hold different types of assets and debt and that there is a substantial gender gap in the monetary value of their net worth, greater than the gender earnings gap recorded in the same year. In our discussion, we reflect on some of the key challenges in measuring wealth as well as remaining gaps in data collection and research.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Casale & Adeola Oyenubi, 2024. "Measuring the gender wealth gap in South Africa using individual‐level data," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 92(1), pages 80-92, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:sajeco:v:92:y:2024:i:1:p:80-92
    DOI: 10.1111/saje.12362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12362
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/saje.12362?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:sajeco:v:92:y:2024:i:1:p:80-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.