IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revurb/v29y2017i3p196-216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Could The Credibility Of The Harris–Todaro Model Be Improved?

Author

Listed:
  • Sarbajit Chaudhuri

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarbajit Chaudhuri, 2017. "How Could The Credibility Of The Harris–Todaro Model Be Improved?," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 196-216, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revurb:v:29:y:2017:i:3:p:196-216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/rurd.12071
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dibyendu Banerjee & Purbasha Bhattacharyya & Susmita Chatterjee, 2024. "Market Distortions and Welfare in Developing Countries: A Search for Critical Levels of Reforms," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 67(2), pages 501-522, June.
    2. Sarbajit Chaudhuri & Somasree Poddar Roychowdhury & Salonkara Chaudhuri, 2019. "Gender-based wage inequality and economic liberalism in the presence of endogenous supply of female labour," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 239-260, December.
    3. Sarbajit Chaudhuri & Sushobhan Mahata & Salonkara Chaudhuri, 2022. "COVID-19 disaster and employment generation program in a developing economy," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 24(1), pages 46-64, June.
    4. Amarjyoti Mahanta, 2022. "The transition of labour in the presence of adaptation cost and labour market segmentation," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 109-125, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revurb:v:29:y:2017:i:3:p:196-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0917-0553 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.