IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v9y1989i2p339-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agenda‐Setting By State Legislative Black Caucuses: Policy Priorities And Factors Of Success

Author

Listed:
  • Cheryl M. Miller

Abstract

As their representation in legislative chambers has increased, black state legislators have organized into caucuses to maximize their policy influence. These caucuses act as policy entrepreneurs in initiating and advancing minority policy goals. The North Carolina Legislative Black Caucus is il‐ lustrative of an emerging force in half the states in moving minority policy issues from the systemic to the formal legislative agenda. Using the 1987 North Carolina Legislative Black Caucus as the research setting, supple‐ mented with selective data on other state caucuses, this article offers insights into the types of policy initiatives state legislative black caucuses advance. Also, situational and political factors that may foster successful agenda‐setting are explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheryl M. Miller, 1989. "Agenda‐Setting By State Legislative Black Caucuses: Policy Priorities And Factors Of Success," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 9(2), pages 339-354, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:9:y:1989:i:2:p:339-354
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1989.tb01129.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1989.tb01129.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1989.tb01129.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amy Atchison & Ian Down, 2009. "Women Cabinet Ministers and Female‐Friendly Social Policy," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), pages 1-23, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:9:y:1989:i:2:p:339-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.