IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v9y1989i1p29-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Regime Framework For Implementation Analysis: Cooperation And Reconciliation Of Federalist Imperatives

Author

Listed:
  • Robert P. Stoker

Abstract

The diffusion of authority characteristic of federal governance challenges national leadership and complicates even the implementation of policy that promises mutual gains. To explore the problems of implementing national policy in a federalist context, this paper proposes a new approach to analysis, t h e implementation regime framework. From the regime perspective, the essential task of the implementation process is to create a context in which implementors are likely to cooperate to achieve policy goals despite the absence of dominating authority. Drawing upon the literature on international cooperation, the regime framework outlines the contextual conditions and elements of policy design that are likely to lead to cooperation in collective decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert P. Stoker, 1989. "A Regime Framework For Implementation Analysis: Cooperation And Reconciliation Of Federalist Imperatives," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 9(1), pages 29-49, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:9:y:1989:i:1:p:29-49
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1989.tb01019.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1989.tb01019.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1989.tb01019.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maddalena Sorrentino & Massimo Simonetta, 2013. "Incentivising inter-municipal collaboration: the Lombard experience," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(4), pages 887-906, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:9:y:1989:i:1:p:29-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.