IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v6y1987i4p645-656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opinion Congruence And The Formulation Of Seismic Safety Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Alvin H. Mushkatel
  • Joanne M. Nigg

Abstract

This article examines key actors’and citizens’perceptions on several issues involving various actions designed to lessen the effects of a damaging earthquake as well as the degree of concern these groups have over the occurrence of such an event. The relationship discovered between key actors’and the public's attitudes on these issues indicates that several other studies of earthquake policy adoption which suggest that a lack of citizen awareness and support for earthquake policy are the major barriers to adoption may be in error. In fact, it is discovered that in the Central states, it is the public which is concerned and supportive of such policy and the key actors who are more reluctant to endorse such policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Alvin H. Mushkatel & Joanne M. Nigg, 1987. "Opinion Congruence And The Formulation Of Seismic Safety Policies," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 6(4), pages 645-656, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:6:y:1987:i:4:p:645-656
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1987.tb00817.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1987.tb00817.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1987.tb00817.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter J. May, 1991. "Addressing public risks: Federal earthquake policy design," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(2), pages 263-285.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:6:y:1987:i:4:p:645-656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.