IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v42y2025i1p29-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public trust in regulatory agencies and support for policies on agricultural gene drive

Author

Listed:
  • Leah W. Buchman
  • Carol L. Goldsmith
  • Elizabeth Heitman
  • Ki Eun Kang
  • Xinsheng Liu

Abstract

Public trust in government agencies plays an important role in the formation of public opinion about public policy issues. However, the association between public trust in regulatory agencies and public support for policy development in emergent biotechnologies such as gene drive is not well understood. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are tasked with coordinating and regulating biotechnology. Drawing on past literature, this study examines how public trust in these federal agencies is associated with public opinion on various options for gene drive policy. Using data from a nationally representative public opinion survey (n = 1220) conducted in 2021, our statistical analyses show that respondents who report higher levels of trust in regulatory agencies are more likely to support policy proposals that promote gene drive research and ultimately, may lead to regulatory policies that allow gene drive to be researched and employed to manage agricultural pests, establishing a pathway for scientists, developers, producers, and consumers alike to realize the benefits of this technology. 公众对政府机构的信任在公共政策议题舆论的形成中发挥着重要作用。然而,尚不清晰的是,公众对监管机构的信任与“公众对基因驱动等新兴生物技术的政策发展的支持”之间的关系。美国农业部(USDA)、美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和美国国家环境保护局(EPA)负责协调和监管生物技术。本研究借鉴以往文献,分析了公众对这些联邦机构的信任如何与“基因驱动政策的不同选择”的舆论相关。通过使用2021年进行的一项全国代表性民意调查(n = 1220)的数据,我们的统计分析表明,对监管机构信任度较高的受访者更有可能支持“促进基因驱动研究”的政策提案,并最终可能导致一系列允许研究和利用基因驱动来管理农业害虫的监管政策,进而为科学家、开发者、生产者和消费者等建立一条路径来实现该技术的益处。. La confianza pública en las agencias gubernamentales juega un papel importante en la formación de la opinión pública sobre cuestiones de política pública. Sin embargo, no se comprende bien la asociación entre la confianza pública en las agencias reguladoras y el apoyo público al desarrollo de políticas en biotecnologías emergentes como el impulso genético. El Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos (USDA), la Administración de Alimentos y Medicamentos (FDA) y la Agencia de Protección Ambiental (EPA) tienen la tarea de coordinar y regular la biotecnología. Basándose en la literatura anterior, este estudio examina cómo la confianza pública en estas agencias federales se asocia con la opinión pública sobre diversas opciones para la política de impulso genético. Utilizando datos de una encuesta de opinión pública representativa a nivel nacional (n = 1220) realizada en 2021, nuestros análisis estadísticos muestran que los encuestados que reportan niveles más altos de confianza en las agencias reguladoras tienen más probabilidades de apoyar propuestas de políticas que promuevan la investigación de impulsores genéticos y, en última instancia, puedan liderar a políticas regulatorias que permitan investigar y emplear el impulso genético para controlar las plagas agrícolas, estableciendo un camino para que científicos, desarrolladores, productores y consumidores se den cuenta de los beneficios de esta tecnología.

Suggested Citation

  • Leah W. Buchman & Carol L. Goldsmith & Elizabeth Heitman & Ki Eun Kang & Xinsheng Liu, 2025. "Public trust in regulatory agencies and support for policies on agricultural gene drive," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 42(1), pages 29-49, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:42:y:2025:i:1:p:29-49
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12610
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.12610?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:42:y:2025:i:1:p:29-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.