Author
Abstract
Policy makers frequently learn from the policy experiences of other governments. Lessons inform decision making, diffusing policy across borders. Using interviews with key policy actors and a comparative analysis of United States and European policy contexts, this study identifies and describes causal mechanisms through which newly emerging offshore wind energy policies diffused across governmental borders. In so doing, this article demonstrates a new approach to understanding policy learning and diffusion to complement the large†N, quantitative analyses that form the bedrock of the literature. The findings support the argument that future studies must account for policy diffusion between subnational and foreign national governments, as well as diffusion between coequal administrative agencies in different policy subsystems—“directions†of diffusion that are invisible to traditional methods, yet likely to become increasingly common in the face of climate change and other wicked problems.政ç–æ‰©æ•£å’ŒæŒ‡å ‘æ€§ï¼šå¯¹æ—©æœŸé‡‡çº³æµ·ä¸Šé£Žèƒ½æ”¿ç–的追踪 政ç–制定者时常从他国政府ä¸å¦åˆ°æ”¿ç–ç» éªŒã€‚è¿™äº›ç» éªŒç©¿è¶Šå›½å®¶è¾¹ç•Œ, 讲述了有关决ç–的扩散政ç–。通过对关键政ç–è¡Œä¸ºè€…è¿›è¡Œé ¢è°ˆ, å Œæ—¶å¯¹ç¾Žå›½å’Œæ¬§æ´²æ”¿ç–èƒŒæ™¯è¿›è¡Œæ¯”è¾ƒåˆ†æž , æœ¬ç ”ç©¶è¯†åˆ«å¹¶æ è¿°äº†ä¸ å Œçš„å› æžœæœºåˆ¶, 海上风能和相关政ç–é€šè¿‡è¿™äº›æœºåˆ¶åœ¨å „å›½æ”¿åºœé—´è¿›è¡Œæ‰©æ•£ã€‚ä¸ºæ¤, æœ¬æ–‡è¯ æ˜Žäº†ä¸€ç§ æ–°çš„æŽªæ–½, ç”¨ä»¥ç †è§£æ”¿ç–å¦ä¹ 和政ç–扩散, è¿›è€Œå¯¹å¤§æ•°é‡ å®šé‡ åˆ†æž ï¼ˆthe large†N, quantitative analyses)进行补充, å Žè€…æ˜¯æ–‡çŒ®çš„åŸºç¡€ã€‚ç ”ç©¶ç»“æžœè®¤ä¸º, æœªæ ¥ç ”ç©¶å¿…é¡»é˜ è¿°åœ°æ–¹æ”¿åºœå’Œå›½å¤–æ”¿åºœä¹‹é—´çš„æ”¿ç–扩散, ä»¥å Šä¸ å Œæ”¿ç–å 系统下对ç‰è¡Œæ”¿æœºæž„之间的政ç–æ‰©æ•£â€”è¿™ç§ æ‰©æ•£çš„â€œæ–¹å ‘â€ æ˜¯ä¼ ç»Ÿæ–¹æ³•æ— æ³•è§‚å¯Ÿåˆ°çš„ã€‚Difusión De PolÃticas y Direccionalidad: delineando La Adopción Temprana De PolÃticas De EnergÃa Eólica MarÃtima Los creadores de polÃticas aprenden frecuentemente de las experiencias polÃticas de otros gobiernos. Las lecciones informan la toma de decisiones, lo cual difunde las polÃticas a otros paÃses. Utilizando entrevistas con actores polÃticos clave y un análisis comparativo de los contextos de polÃtica en Europa y EE. UU., este estudio identifica y describe los mecanismos causales a través de los cuales la energÃa eólica marÃtima y las polÃticas relacionadas se difunden a otros gobiernos. Al hacer esto, este artÃculo demuestra una nueva aproximación hacia la comprensión del aprendizaje y difusión de polÃticas para complementar los análisis cuantitativos “Large†N†que le dan forma a la base de la investigación existente. Los hallazgos apoyan el argumento que los estudios futuros tienen que explicar la difusión entre los gobiernos subnacionales y de otras naciones, asà como la difusión entre agencias administrativas del mismo nivel en diferentes subsistemas polÃticos– “direcciones†de difusión que son invisibles para los métodos tradicionales.
Suggested Citation
Michael J. Motta, 2018.
"Policy Diffusion and Directionality: Tracing Early Adoption of Offshore Wind Policy,"
Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 35(3), pages 398-421, May.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:revpol:v:35:y:2018:i:3:p:398-421
DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12281
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Michael J. Motta, 2021.
"Diffusion and Typology: The Invention and Early Adoption of Medicinal Marijuana and Offshore Wind Policies,"
Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(1), pages 567-584, January.
- Ikenna Samuel Umezurike & Ibraheem Salisu Adam, 2020.
"The Latin American and Nigerian Conditional Cash Transfer Experience: A Comparative Analysis,"
Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 2037-2037, December.
- Evan M. Mistur & John Wagner Givens & Daniel C. Matisoff, 2023.
"Contagious COVID‐19 policies: Policy diffusion during times of crisis,"
Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(1), pages 36-62, January.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:35:y:2018:i:3:p:398-421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.