IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v27y2010i3p255-271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nanotechnology . . . What Is It Good For? (Absolutely Everything): A Problem Definition Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Lindquist
  • Katrina N. Mosher‐Howe
  • Xinsheng Liu

Abstract

Problem definition studies focus on the ways in which problems are characterized in the political domain, and how they can be used strategically to limit or expand policy participation. Nanotechnology entrepreneurs are vying for resources in the political domain while strategically linking their nano‐solution to multiple and ambiguous problems. This article considers the evolution of nanotechnology as a solution, and the linked problems from a problem definition perspective. We consider how nanotechnology has been defined over time, in the scientific community and in the media, through development of a database of problem and solution definitional change. We find that, over time, advocates have defined the solution from a more narrow perspective while maintaining the overall ambiguity of the problem set. We suggest that the problem definition perspective is a viable framework for understanding the fluid and complex dynamics of science and technology issues and offer several suggestions for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Lindquist & Katrina N. Mosher‐Howe & Xinsheng Liu, 2010. "Nanotechnology . . . What Is It Good For? (Absolutely Everything): A Problem Definition Approach," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 27(3), pages 255-271, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:27:y:2010:i:3:p:255-271
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00441.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00441.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00441.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Lindquist, 2006. "Survival and Institutionalization of an Idea: The Rapid Rise of Intelligent Vehicle‐Highway Systems," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 23(4), pages 887-902, July.
    2. Walker, Jack L., 1977. "Setting the Agenda in the U.S. Senate: A Theory of Problem Selection," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(4), pages 423-445, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leong, Ching Ching & Jarvis, Darryl & Howlett, Michael & Migone, Andrea, 2011. "Controversial science-based technology public attitude formation and regulation in comparative perspective: The state construction of policy alternatives in Asia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 128-136.
    2. Jonathan Lewallen, 2021. "Emerging technologies and problem definition uncertainty: The case of cybersecurity," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1035-1052, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Howard Kunreuther & John W. Lathrop, 1981. "Siting Hazardous Facilities: Lessons from LNG," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(4), pages 289-302, December.
    2. Lockwood, Ben & Porcelli, Francesco & Redoano, Michela & Schiavone, Antonio, 2022. "Does Data Disclosure Improve Local Government Performance? Evidence from Italian Municipalities," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1434, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    3. F L Cook & W G Skogan, 1990. "Agenda Setting and the Rise and Fall of Policy Issues: The Case of Criminal Victimization of the Elderly," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 8(4), pages 395-415, December.
    4. Enriqueta Aragonès & Clara Ponsatí, 2022. "Shocks to issue salience and electoral competition," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 33-63, March.
    5. Charles D. Taylor, 2012. "Governors as Economic Problem Solvers," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 26(3), pages 267-276, August.
    6. Macedo, Suélem Viana & Valadares, Josiel Lopes & de Melo, James Rocha Rodrigues, 2021. "The formulation of Brazil's mineral policy: A multiple streams explanation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    7. Azad Bali & Darren Halpin, 2021. "Agenda-setting instruments: means and strategies for the management of policy demands [Mayflies and old bulls: Organization persistence in state interest communities]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(3), pages 333-344.
    8. Gerald A. Cole & Stephen B. Withey, 1981. "Perspectives on Risk Perceptions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), pages 143-163, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:27:y:2010:i:3:p:255-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.