IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v27y2010i1p77-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Lands Policy and Economic Trends in Gateway Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Rick S. Kurtz

Abstract

From the mid‐1960s through 1980, major policy changes were adopted as a result of federal and state public lands protection statutes. This article analyzes the impact these policy changes have had upon the economies of gateway communities, a subject of limited discussion in the scholarly literature. One conclusion is that gateway community economies have become less dependent on resources extraction. This analysis finds that several factors––beyond policy change––have influenced the shift away from resources extraction. Likewise, there is the question over what economic mainstays have stepped in to fill the resources extraction void? For many gateway communities, it appears that the answer has been recreational tourism. The implications of this economic shift within gateway communities are explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Rick S. Kurtz, 2010. "Public Lands Policy and Economic Trends in Gateway Communities," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 27(1), pages 77-88, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:27:y:2010:i:1:p:77-88
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00428.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00428.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00428.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rick S. Kurtz, 2004. "Coastal Oil Pollution: Spills, Crisis, and Policy Change1," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 21(2), pages 201-219, March.
    2. Rick S. Kurtz, 2006. "The Federal Concessioner System: Linking Policy to Opportunities for Local Service Providers," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 23(2), pages 373-386, March.
    3. Thomas A. Birkland, 2004. "“The World Changed Today”: Agenda‐Setting and Policy Change in the Wake of the September 11 Terrorist Attacks," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 21(2), pages 179-200, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Inwon Kang & Hae Seok Jee & Matthew Minsuk Shin, 2018. "Affective Policy Performance Evaluation Model: A Case of an International Trade Policy Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Fangbing Hu & Wenqing Kong & John L. Innes & Wanli Wu & Terry Sunderland & Guangyu Wang, 2022. "Residents’ Perceptions toward Tourism Development: A Case Study from Grand Canyon National Park, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Wallace, Kelly C., 2022. "Camping in clearcuts: the impacts of timber harvesting on USFS campground utilization," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322513, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles Davis & Katherine Hoffer, 2012. "Federalizing energy? Agenda change and the politics of fracking," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(3), pages 221-241, September.
    2. Yamamura, Eiji, 2011. "Effect of free media on views regarding the safety of nuclear energy after the 2011 disasters in Japan: evidence using cross-country data," MPRA Paper 32011, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Meijun Liu & Yi Bu & Chongyan Chen & Jian Xu & Daifeng Li & Yan Leng & Richard B. Freeman & Eric T. Meyer & Wonjin Yoon & Mujeen Sung & Minbyul Jeong & Jinhyuk Lee & Jaewoo Kang & Chao Min & Min Song , 2022. "Pandemics are catalysts of scientific novelty: Evidence from COVID‐19," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(8), pages 1065-1078, August.
    4. Matthew Kahn, 2007. "Environmental disasters as risk regulation catalysts? The role of Bhopal, Chernobyl, Exxon Valdez, Love Canal, and Three Mile Island in shaping U.S. environmental law," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 17-43, August.
    5. Nikolaos Zahariadis, 2016. "Delphic oracles: ambiguity, institutions, and multiple streams," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 49(1), pages 3-12, March.
    6. Shiwei Fan & Lan Xue & Jianhua Xu, 2018. "What Drives Policy Attention to Climate Change in China? An Empirical Analysis through the Lens of People’s Daily," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Vytautas VALENTINAVIÄŒIUS, 2022. "The role of focusing events on agenda-setting: changes in the Lithuanian security policy agenda after the annexation of Crimea," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 13, pages 309-329, June.
    8. Sotirov, Metodi & Memmler, Michael, 2012. "The Advocacy Coalition Framework in natural resource policy studies — Recent experiences and further prospects," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 51-64.
    9. Salvador Parrado, 2020. "The culture of risk regulation: Responses to environmental disasters," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 599-615, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:27:y:2010:i:1:p:77-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.