IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v24y2007i1p67-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mixing God's Work and the Public Business: A Framework for the Analysis of Faith‐Based Service Delivery

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Hula
  • Cynthia Jackson‐Elmoore
  • Laura Reese

Abstract

Over the past thirty years, there has been a dramatic transformation in the way the American political process operates. There has been a growing public perception that traditional political institutions lack the capacity to meet existing challenges. This has led many observers to call for a rethinking of how government does its work. Numerous alternatives, including the use of faith‐based organizations, have been suggested. The current popular debate on the appropriate role of faith‐based organizations in public service delivery has shed little light on a number of important issues raised by engaging such actors in governance issues. The impact of using faith‐based institutions to design and implement public policy must be considered not only in terms of traditional evaluation standards, but also regarding potential long‐term impacts on the political process itself. This article outlines a theoretical framework for the evaluation of faith‐based organizations as “alternatives” to conventional governance structures. It identifies key practical and theoretical issues raised by such substitution, in both short and long range systemic terms.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Hula & Cynthia Jackson‐Elmoore & Laura Reese, 2007. "Mixing God's Work and the Public Business: A Framework for the Analysis of Faith‐Based Service Delivery," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 24(1), pages 67-89, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:24:y:2007:i:1:p:67-89
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00268.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00268.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00268.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anthony Perl & Michael Howlett & M. Ramesh, 2018. "Policy-making and truthiness: Can existing policy models cope with politicized evidence and willful ignorance in a “post-fact” world?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 581-600, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:24:y:2007:i:1:p:67-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.