IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v23y2006i2p339-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community‐Based Participatory Research as a Tool for Policy Change: A Case Study of the Southern California Environmental Justice Collaborative

Author

Listed:
  • Dana Petersen
  • Meredith Minkler
  • Victoria Breckwich Vásquez
  • Andrea Corage Baden

Abstract

In 2000, a regional rule governing maximum individual cancer risk from stationary facilities in Southern California was dramatically altered, reducing allowable risk levels by 75%. This article uses a case study approach to explore the role of a community‐based participatory research (CBPR) partnership, the Southern California Environmental Justice Collaborative, in producing research and helping spearhead policy advocacy leading to this policy change. It also highlights the role of the collaborative in helping to change the framing of the issue from individual to cumulative risk assessment, so that the regulatory agencies began to reflect this broader thinking in their policymaking. The collaborative's structure and methodology, regional focus, relationships with key decision makers, and its reputation as an important source of both credible science and “people power” were seen as contributing to its effectiveness. The role of contextual factors including a recovering and more regulation‐friendly economy also is highlighted, as are key barriers faced. Implications for other community–academic partnerships working to address regional and statewide public policy are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Dana Petersen & Meredith Minkler & Victoria Breckwich Vásquez & Andrea Corage Baden, 2006. "Community‐Based Participatory Research as a Tool for Policy Change: A Case Study of the Southern California Environmental Justice Collaborative," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 23(2), pages 339-354, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:23:y:2006:i:2:p:339-354
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00204.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00204.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00204.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. White, Tara & Murphy, Kathleen & Branje, Karina & McKibbon, Shelley & Cunsolo, Ashlee & Latimer, Margot & McMillan, Jane & Sylliboy, John & Martin, Debbie, 2021. "How has Indigenous Health Research changed in Atlantic Canada over two decades? A scoping review from 2001 to 2020," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    2. Turaga, Rama Mohana R. & Noonan, Douglas & Bostrom, Ann, 2011. "Hot spots regulation and environmental justice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(7), pages 1395-1405, May.
    3. Timothy J. Downs & Laurie Ross & Robert Goble & Rajendra Subedi & Sara Greenberg & Octavia Taylor, 2011. "Vulnerability, Risk Perception, and Health Profile of Marginalized People Exposed to Multiple Built‐Environment Stressors in Worcester, Massachusetts: A Pilot Project," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 609-628, April.
    4. Jonathan K. London & Krista A. Haapanen & Ann Backus & Savannah M. Mack & Marti Lindsey & Karen Andrade, 2020. "Aligning Community-Engaged Research to Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:23:y:2006:i:2:p:339-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.