IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v1y1981i2p255-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State Energy Policies: Federal Funds For Paper Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas R. Dye
  • Dorothy K. Davidson

Abstract

Taking their policy cues from the federal government, the states have done little to effectively deal with energy problems. In fact, their programs could be styled “federal funds for paper programs.” inasmuch as the state programs have been written to conform to federal language, but not to attack energy problems in a serious fashion. There is great variation among the states in energy program expenditures, but these are not related to economic or political structures. However, the more urbanized, economically growing, and energy “rich” states spend the most on energy problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas R. Dye & Dorothy K. Davidson, 1981. "State Energy Policies: Federal Funds For Paper Programs," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 1(2), pages 255-262, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:1:y:1981:i:2:p:255-262
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1981.tb00409.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1981.tb00409.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1981.tb00409.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhirong Zhao, 2005. "Motivations, Obstacles, and Resources: The Adoption Of The General-Purpose Local Option Sales Tax in Georgia Counties," Public Finance Review, , vol. 33(6), pages 721-746, November.
    2. Nils C. Bandelow & Johanna Hornung & Ilana Schröder, 2023. "Policy responses and public reactions to risks," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(1), pages 6-9, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:1:y:1981:i:2:p:255-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.