IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v19y2002i2p62-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

TRANSPORTATION AT THE MILLENNIUM: In Search of a Megaproject Lens

Author

Listed:
  • Wendy Haynes

Abstract

Penetrating the complexity of publicly funded megaprojects‐ those costing in excess of $1 billion—is no small task, but it can be a rewarding one. Five tiers of rich descriptors emerge from the literature: history and purpose; context; project structure; funding; and performance measures. The five‐tier approach is used to analyze one megaproject: Boston's $14‐billion‐plus Central Artery/Tunnel Project. With time and attention, this preliminary framework could be helpful in profiling and learning from public works megaprojects generally, and transportation megaprojects particularly.

Suggested Citation

  • Wendy Haynes, 2002. "TRANSPORTATION AT THE MILLENNIUM: In Search of a Megaproject Lens," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 19(2), pages 62-64, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:19:y:2002:i:2:p:62-64
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00265.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00265.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00265.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicolas Dahan & Jonathan Doh & Jonathan Raelin, 2015. "Pivoting the Role of Government in the Business and Society Interface: A Stakeholder Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(3), pages 665-680, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:19:y:2002:i:2:p:62-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.