IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v16y1999i3-4p278-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Problem Of Power:

Author

Listed:
  • Michael D. Parsons

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to offer a methodological approach for reconstructing and reclaiming power in policy analysis and research. Positivist and post‐positivist researchers have largely abandoned the concept after failing to produce a universal definition of power. Interpretive researchers tend to produce definitions that are a function of the methodology and theory selected to guide the inquiry review earlier efforts to define power before presenting a methodology that was used to guide a study of power in the federal higher education policy arena. The methodology combines several methods with the common thread being interpretation. At the heart of this approach is Callon and Latour's (1981) sociology of translation. The claim made for this approach is that it presents a clearer field of vision unimpeded by a priori interpretations or theories of power. The meaning of power is allowed to emerge from the social setting which is being studied.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael D. Parsons, 1999. "The Problem Of Power:," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 16(3‐4), pages 278-310, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:16:y:1999:i:3-4:p:278-310
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00886.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00886.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00886.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:16:y:1999:i:3-4:p:278-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.