IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revinw/v70y2024i3p862-882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group‐specific redistribution, inequality, and subjective well‐being in China

Author

Listed:
  • Peihua Deng
  • Ronnie Schöb

Abstract

Using survey data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from 2010 to 2018, this paper analyzes the relationship between income inequality, group‐specific income redistribution, and subjective well‐being among China's urban, rural, and migrant populations. Income redistribution significantly reduces the within‐group inequality for urban residents while widening the income gap among urban residents, rural residents, and migrants. Using narrowly defined reference groups, our findings indicate that there is no significant correlation of within‐group inequality and subjective well‐being of the respective group members. By contrast, the increased income gap between urban and rural residents is positively correlated with the rural residents' subjective well‐being. More importantly, the group‐specific redistribution inherent in the Hukou system that widens the income gap between urban residents and both migrants and rural residents makes both the aforementioned worse off. The existing Hukou system thus bars the way to implement the concept of “common prosperity” of the Chinese government that aims to foster a more balanced and sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Peihua Deng & Ronnie Schöb, 2024. "Group‐specific redistribution, inequality, and subjective well‐being in China," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 70(3), pages 862-882, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:70:y:2024:i:3:p:862-882
    DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12671
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/roiw.12671?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:70:y:2024:i:3:p:862-882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iariwea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.