IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revinw/v70y2024i2p254-277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inequality Measurement and The Rich: Why Inequality Increased More Than We Thought

Author

Listed:
  • Frank A. Cowell
  • Emmanuel Flachaire

Abstract

To compare income and wealth distributions and to assess the effects of policy that affect those distributions require reliable inequality‐measurement tools. However, commonly used inequality measures such as the Gini coefficient have an apparently counter‐intuitive property: income growth among the rich may actually reduce measured inequality. We show that there are just two inequality measures that both avoid this anomalous behavior and satisfy the principle of transfers. We further show that the recent increases in US income inequality are understated by the conventional Gini coefficient and explain why a simple alternative inequality measure should be preferred in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank A. Cowell & Emmanuel Flachaire, 2024. "Inequality Measurement and The Rich: Why Inequality Increased More Than We Thought," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 70(2), pages 254-277, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:70:y:2024:i:2:p:254-277
    DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12638
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/roiw.12638?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:70:y:2024:i:2:p:254-277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iariwea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.