IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revinw/v60y2014is2ps380-s397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dutch Growth Accounts: Measuring Productivity with Non-Zero Profits

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Haan
  • Erik Veldhuizen
  • Murat Tanriseven
  • Myriam Rooijen-Horsten

Abstract

Since 2007 Statistics Netherlands has been publishing multifactor productivity statistics at the macro and industry branch level. Updates of these statistics are annually released in StatLine, the online statistical database of Statistics Netherlands. In contrast to most other growth accounting exercises, the official growth accounts of Statistics Netherlands employ an exogenous rate of return to capital to calculate capital services. As a consequence, in the Dutch Growth Accounts output does not necessarily match total production costs. Supplementary to the exogenous model, Statistics Netherlands also publishes growth accounts based on endogenous rates of return. The aim of this paper is to investigate the effects of scaling up capital measurement on input cost shares, contributions to output growth, and productivity, applying both the exogenous and endogenous models. The results show that endogenous rates of return to capital are less applicable in growth accounts in which the coverage of capital is restricted to fixed assets only. The rates of return to capital converge when expanding the capital inputs with additional assets such as land, inventories, and subsoil assets. But this is not necessarily true for the capital contributions to economic growth. Finally, the capitalization of a wider range of intangible assets, beyond the SNA boundaries, has particularly for the 1995–2001 period a significant effect on the Dutch Growth Accounting results, irrespective of using either an exogenous or an endogenous rate of return to capital.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Haan & Erik Veldhuizen & Murat Tanriseven & Myriam Rooijen-Horsten, 2014. "The Dutch Growth Accounts: Measuring Productivity with Non-Zero Profits," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 60(S2), pages 380-397, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:60:y:2014:i:s2:p:s380-s397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/roiw.12140
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dale W. Jorgenson & Paul Schreyer, 2013. "Industry-Level Productivity Measurement And The 2008 System Of National Accounts," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 59(2), pages 185-211, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marshall Reinsdorf & Robert Hill, 2014. "The 32nd IARIW General Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, 2012: Editors’ Introduction," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 60(S2), pages 277-280, November.
    2. C. A. K. Lovell, 2016. "Recent Developments in Productivity Analysis," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 417-444, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Carlos Conesa & Pau S. Pujolas, 2019. "The Canadian productivity stagnation, 20022014," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 52(2), pages 561-583, May.
    2. Dale W. Jorgenson, 2017. "World KLEMS: Productivity and Economic Growth in the World Economy: An Introduction," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 33, pages 1-7, Fall.
    3. Diane Coyle, 2022. "Healthcare as social infrastructure: productivity and the UK NHS during and after Covid-19," Working Papers 017, The Productivity Institute.
    4. Francisco Pérez & Eva Benages, 2017. "The Role of Capital Accumulation in the Evolution of Total Factor Productivity in Spain," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 33, pages 24-50, Fall.
    5. Oliver Loertscher & Pau S. Pujolas, 2024. "Canadian productivity growth: Stuck in the oil sands," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(2), pages 478-501, May.
    6. Jorgenson, Dale W. & Vu, Khuong M., 2016. "The outlook for emerging economies," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 670-682.
    7. Robin Lynch, 2019. "The treatment of Intellectual Property in the National Accounts," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2019-10, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
    8. Dale W. Jorgenson & Mun S. Ho & Jon D. Samuels, 2017. "Educational Attainment and the Revival of US Economic Growth," NBER Chapters, in: Education, Skills, and Technical Change: Implications for Future US GDP Growth, pages 23-60, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Serena Fatica, 2017. "Measurement and Allocation of Capital Inputs With Taxes: A Sensitivity Analysis for OECD Countries," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 63(1), pages 1-29, March.
    10. Jakub Boratyński & Jacek Osiewalski, 2021. "Bayesian Estimation of Capital Stock and Depreciation in the Production Function Framework," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 13(4), pages 455-486, December.
    11. Jorgenson, Dale W. & Ho, Mun S. & Samuels, Jon D., 2016. "The impact of information technology on postwar US economic growth," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 398-411.
    12. Corby Garner & Justin Harper & Tom Howells & Matt Russell & Jon Samuels, 2018. "Backcasting the BEA/BLS Integrated Industry-level Production Account and the Sources of U.S. Economic Growth between 1987 and 2016," BEA Working Papers 0151, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    13. Jean-Philippe Boussemart & Hervé Leleu & Edward Mensah, 2017. "Generation and distribution of the total factor productivity gains in US industries," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(24), pages 2379-2393, May.
    14. Corrado, Carol & Haskel, Jonathan & Jona-Lasinio, Cecilia, 2019. "Productivity growth, capital reallocation and the financial crisis: Evidence from Europe and the US," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Wan-Jiun Chen & Chien-Ho Wang, 2020. "A General Cross-Country Panel Analysis for the Effects of Capitals and Energy, on Economic Growth and Carbon Dioxide Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    16. D. S. Prasada Rao & Alicia N. Rambaldi & Bert M. Balk, 2015. "On Measuring Regional or Global Growth and Inflation," Discussion Papers Series 552, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    17. W. Diewert, 2014. "US TFP growth and the contribution of changes in export and import prices to real income growth," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 19-39, February.
    18. Jorgenson, Dale W. & Vu, Khuong M., 2021. "The G20 and the world economy: Performance and prospects," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 770-782.
    19. Corby Garner & Justin Harper & Thomas F. Howells III & Matt Russell & Jon Samuels, 2019. "New BEA-BLS Estimates of the Sources of U.S. Economic Growth between 1987 and 2016," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 36, pages 187-203, Spring.
    20. Jorgenson, Dale W., 2016. "Econometric general equilibrium modeling," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 436-447.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:60:y:2014:i:s2:p:s380-s397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iariwea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.