IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revinw/v38y1992i3p341-353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Budget Standard Poverty Lines For Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Muniappan Perumal

Abstract

In this paper, shortcomings of the official poverty line are examined. A new set of budget standard poverty lines were derived for various years between 1959 and 1981, by first estimating the food budget for Malaysian households. Then, an allowance for non‐food items was obtained on the basis of the estimated food budget, and the relationship between the proportion of income allocated on food and non‐food items, together yielding the poverty line. The results suggest that the official and other estimates of the poverty line income were generally higher, and thus have overestimated the extent of poverty in Malaysia.

Suggested Citation

  • Muniappan Perumal, 1992. "New Budget Standard Poverty Lines For Malaysia," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 38(3), pages 341-353, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:38:y:1992:i:3:p:341-353
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.1992.tb00430.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1992.tb00430.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1992.tb00430.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Renuka Mahadevan, 2007. "The poverty transition: when, how and what next?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(8), pages 1099-1113.
    2. Thaiyoong Penny Mok & Gillis Maclean & Paul Dalziel, 2013. "Alternative Poverty Lines for Malaysia," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 27(1), pages 85-104, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:38:y:1992:i:3:p:341-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iariwea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.