IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revinw/v31y1985i1p1-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National Accounting For Non‐Renewable Natural Resources In The Mining Industries

Author

Listed:
  • J. Steven Landefeld
  • James R. Hines

Abstract

This paper discusses alternatives to current national accounting procedures for non‐renewable natural resources in the mining industries. Three alternative approaches to valuing the discovery and use of these resources are compared and alternative estimates for U.S. oil and gas for the period 1948‐79 are presented. The focus is on the conceptual and empirical difficulties associated with valuing non‐renewable natural resources.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Steven Landefeld & James R. Hines, 1985. "National Accounting For Non‐Renewable Natural Resources In The Mining Industries," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 31(1), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:31:y:1985:i:1:p:1-20
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.1985.tb00495.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1985.tb00495.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1985.tb00495.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roger S. Smith, 1992. "Income Growth, Government Spending, and Wasting Assets - Alberta's Oil and Gas," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 18(4), pages 387-412, December.
    2. Depta, Peter & Ravalli, Frank & Harding, Don, 1994. "Extended Measures of Investment and Saving," MPRA Paper 3319, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Yoshifusa Kitabatake, 1998. "Environmental resource accounting frameworks for the public domain and public trust managements," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 1(1), pages 69-93, June.
    4. Butterfield, David W., 2003. "Resource depletion under uncertainty: implications for mine depreciation, Hartwick's Rule and national accounting," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 219-238, August.
    5. A.R. Kemal & Faiz Bilquees & Zafar Mahmood, 1995. "National Income Accounting and Environment: A Case Study of Waterlogging and Salinity in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 34(4), pages 581-590.
    6. Young, Carlos Eduardo Frickmann & da Motta, Ronaldo Seroa, 1995. "Measuring sustainable income from mineral extraction in Brazil," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 113-125, June.
    7. Shzee Tai & Kusairi Noh & Nik Abdullah, 2000. "Valuing Fisheries Depreciation in Natural Resource Accounting: The Pelagic Fisheries in Northeast Peninsular Malaysia," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 15(3), pages 227-241, March.
    8. John M. Clapp & Jeffrey P. Cohen & Thies Lindenthal, 2023. "Are Estimates of Rapid Growth in Urban Land Values an Artifact of the Land Residual Model?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 373-421, February.
    9. Haripriya Gundimeda, 2006. "The Value of Timber, Carbon, Fuelwood,and Non-Timber Forest Products in India's Forests," Working Papers id:516, eSocialSciences.
    10. Santopietro, George D., 1998. "Alternative methods for estimating resource rent and depletion cost: the case of Argentina's YPF," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 39-48, March.
    11. Susan L. Sakmar & Mathis Wackernagel & Alessandro Galli & David Moore, 2011. "Sustainable Development and Environmental Challenges in The MENA Region: Accounting for The Environment In The 21st Century," Working Papers 592, Economic Research Forum, revised 06 Jan 2011.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:31:y:1985:i:1:p:1-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iariwea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.