IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reviec/v33y2025i1p265-289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade wars and trade disputes: The role of equity and political support

Author

Listed:
  • Eddy Bekkers
  • Joseph F. Francois
  • Douglas R. Nelson
  • Hugo Rojas‐Romagosa

Abstract

Recent theoretical and quantitative analysis of trade wars is grounded in a relatively narrow treatment of optimal tariff theory and noncooperative Nash equilibria. The lynchpin of this approach is the assumption that trade policy makers are rational and have a simple well‐established objective function to optimize. We argue that the preferred specification of this objective function ignores inequality at its peril. We work with a quantitative trade model, introducing a comprehensive tariff‐space grid search new to the literature. This allows us to explicitly check for the presence of multiple Nash outcomes. We show that including income inequality—a primary focus of the earlier literature—as a determinant of social welfare can substantially change noncooperative Nash outcomes. We also show that the optimal tariff of the US falls by half when the social welfare function includes inequality as an objective. Hence, the economic outcomes of actual trade wars may be very different from what recent estimates grounded in optimal tariff theory would suggest.

Suggested Citation

  • Eddy Bekkers & Joseph F. Francois & Douglas R. Nelson & Hugo Rojas‐Romagosa, 2025. "Trade wars and trade disputes: The role of equity and political support," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 265-289, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:33:y:2025:i:1:p:265-289
    DOI: 10.1111/roie.12742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12742
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/roie.12742?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:33:y:2025:i:1:p:265-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0965-7576 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.