IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reviec/v11y2003i4p729-744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factor Market Oligopsony and the Production Possibility Frontier

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Devadoss
  • Wongun Song

Abstract

The authors consider a model with two final goods, one intermediate good, and two primary factors. One final good and the intermediate good are produced using primary factors, labor and capital. The other final good is produced using labor and the intermediate input. Producers of the second final good exert oligopsonistic market power on the intermediate input, which captures real world phenomena prevalent in the food processing and other manufacturing industries. If the capital/labor ratio in one final‐good sector is in between those of the intermediate‐input sector and the combined intermediate‐input and the other final‐product sectors, and if the oligopsony power is sufficiently large, the model generates results that are not adherent to the standard two‐sector Heckscher–Ohlin model. Results that deviate from the H–O model include the relationships between factor prices and commodity prices, the price–output effect, tangency between the price line and the PPF, and the curvature of the PPF.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Devadoss & Wongun Song, 2003. "Factor Market Oligopsony and the Production Possibility Frontier," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), pages 729-744, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:11:y:2003:i:4:p:729-744
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9396.00414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9396.00414
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9396.00414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raveendra N. Batra, 1973. "Studies in the Pure Theory of International Trade," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-01423-1, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naoto Jinji, 2012. "Factor market monopsony and international duopoly," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 271-286, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Choi, E. Kwan, 2008. "Factor growth and equalized factor prices," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 517-528, October.
    2. Stephen Devadoss & Wongun Song, 2003. "Oligopsonistic Intermediate Input and Patterns of Trade," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 77-97.
    3. M. Ali Khan & Po-Sheng Lin, 1982. "Sub -optimal Tariff Policy and Gains from Trade for LDCs with Urban Unemployment," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 21(2), pages 105-126.
    4. Sorin BURNETE, 2017. "Outsourcing under Threat: Estimated Impact of Potential Tariffs on US Imports from Mexico," Expert Journal of Economics, Sprint Investify, vol. 5(3), pages 88-97.
    5. Bharat Hazari & Pasquale Sgro, 1996. "Free trade zones, tariffs and the real exchange rate," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 199-217, July.
    6. Stephen Devadoss & Wongun Song, 2006. "Oligopsony Distortions and Welfare Implications of Trade," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(3), pages 452-465, August.
    7. Chaudhuri, Sarbajit & Biswas, Anindya, 2016. "Endogenous labour market imperfection, foreign direct investment and external terms-of-trade shocks in a developing economy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 416-424.
    8. Chaudhuri, Sarbajit & Mukhopadhyay, Ujjaini, 2009. "Revisiting the Informal Sector: A General Equilibrium Approach," MPRA Paper 52135, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. John Mutti, 1981. "Regional Analysis from the Standpoint of International Trade: Is it a Useful Perspective?," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 6(2), pages 95-120, August.
    10. Sarbajit Chaudhuri, 2016. "Trade Unionism and Welfare Consequences of Trade and Investment Reforms in A Developing Economy," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(1), pages 152-171, February.
    11. Parthasarathi Shome, 1985. "Is the Corporate Tax Shifted? Empirical Evidence from Asean," Public Finance Review, , vol. 13(1), pages 21-46, January.
    12. Jai-Young Choi & Eden S. H. Yu, 2013. "Market imperfection and international trade in a dynamic economy," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 9(4), pages 319-336, December.
    13. Chaudhuri, Sarbajit & Kumar Dwibedi, Jayanta & Biswas, Anindya, 2017. "Subsidizing healthcare in the presence of market distortions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 539-552.
    14. Runa Ray & Biswajit Chatterjee, 2010. "Impact of Restrictive Trade Policy on Adult Unemployment, Welfare and the Incidence of Child Labour -A Three Sector General Equilibrium Analysis," Journal of Quantitative Economics, The Indian Econometric Society, vol. 8(1), pages 148-161, January.
    15. Huria, Sugandha, 2020. "Gains from Free Trade Agreements: A Theoretical Analysis," MPRA Paper 109815, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Yano, Makoto, 2021. "Professor Ronald W. Jones and his influence on Asia Pacific economics," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    17. Chaudhuri, Sarbajit, 2014. "How can trade unionism affect welfare consequences of trade and investment reforms in a developing economy?," MPRA Paper 59063, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Choi, Jai-Young & Price, Donald I. & Allen, C. Larry, 1997. "Further implications of tariffs in the mobile capital Harris-Todaro model," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 87-102.
    19. George Darko & Richard Dusansky & Pankaj Maskara & Nadeem Naqvi, 2006. "The gains from trade in a small monetary economy," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 403-430.
    20. Amar K. Parai & Hamid Beladi, 1998. "Imperfect Labor Mobility and Unemployment in LDCs: Reply," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(1), pages 182-184, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:11:y:2003:i:4:p:729-744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0965-7576 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.