IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reesec/v5y1977i3p255-278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What A National Commission on Neighborhoods Could Do

Author

Listed:
  • Robert K. Yin

Abstract

This paper addresses the problems to be faced by a national commission on neighborhoods. Legislation to create such a study group was introduced during the past year, in conjunction with renewed interest in neighborhood conservation and revitalization. However, there have been many earlier study groups that have already made most of the recommendations which might be expected from a new effort. The work of a new commission should therefore focus on the ways in which the study group conducts its activities. For instance, a new commission should explicitly assess existing programs (with a view toward reducing some of the less efficient or contradictory ones), should broaden its attempts to solicit the views of residents, should conduct advocate inquiries in addition to research analyses, should focus on the organizational problems of implementing any new recommendations, and should help neighborhoods to develop simple techniques for monitoring neighborhood change. This paper also points out some of the critical issues that any new study group must face, including the problem that the prime candidates for neighborhood preservation are not likely to be poverty neighborhoods. Therefore, neighborhood revitalization policies cannot easily serve both middle‐ and low‐income constituents.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert K. Yin, 1977. "What A National Commission on Neighborhoods Could Do," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 5(3), pages 255-278, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:5:y:1977:i:3:p:255-278
    DOI: 10.1111/1540-6229.00830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00830
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1540-6229.00830?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:5:y:1977:i:3:p:255-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/areueea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.