IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reesec/v12y1984i4p461-472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Condominium Conversion and the Tax Reform Acts of 1969 and 1976

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J. Whinihan

Abstract

Condominium conversions became a major factor in housing markets durig the 1970s. The analysis presented in this paper suggests that rental housing investors are in high marginal tax brackets and use rental housing tax losses to shelter other income. These characteristics imply that rental housing tax benefits are an important determinant of rental housing investment. The Tax Reform Act of 1969 and 1976 reduced rental housing tax benefits and may have provided an important stimulus for the condominium conversions of the 1970s. Tax and survey data confirm the predicted characteristics of rental‐housing investors. Estimates of rental flows in Chicago from 1962 to 1977 indicate that the Tax Reform Act of 1969 and 1976 were possible causes of condominium conversions during the 1970s.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J. Whinihan, 1984. "Condominium Conversion and the Tax Reform Acts of 1969 and 1976," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 12(4), pages 461-472, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:12:y:1984:i:4:p:461-472
    DOI: 10.1111/1540-6229.00333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00333
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1540-6229.00333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John D. Benjamin & Peter Chinloy & William G. Hardin & Zhonghua Wu, 2008. "Clientele Effects and Condo Conversions," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 36(3), pages 611-634, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:12:y:1984:i:4:p:461-472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/areueea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.