IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reesec/v12y1984i1p86-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Reliability of Fair Housing Audits to Detect Racial Discrimination in Rental Housing Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Clifford E. Reid

Abstract

Racial discrimination against black Americans continues to exert a pervasive influence on all aspects of American life. This paper investigates the reliability of two techniques currently used by local fair housing groups to measure the extent of racial discrimination in the rental housing market: in‐person audits and telephone audits. When we do not control for the presence of vacancies, we observe a moderate rate of reliability between the in‐person audits and the telephone audits. When we control for the presence of vacancies, we observe a much higher degree of reliability between the two methods used to detect racial discrimination in rental housing markets. We conclude that these techniques are useful devices to detect racial discrimination in housing markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Clifford E. Reid, 1984. "The Reliability of Fair Housing Audits to Detect Racial Discrimination in Rental Housing Markets," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 12(1), pages 86-96, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:12:y:1984:i:1:p:86-96
    DOI: 10.1111/1540-6229.00312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00312
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1540-6229.00312?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Veronica Reed, 1991. "Civil rights legislation and the housing status of black americans: Evidence from fair housing audits and segregation indices," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 19(3), pages 29-42, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:12:y:1984:i:1:p:86-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/areueea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.