IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v29y2025i2p747-774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patriarchal norms and women's labor market outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Anirban Mukherjee
  • Sukanya Sarkhel

Abstract

Gender discrimination in the labor market is usually seen as the result of the employers' cultural bias. In this article, we see the issue from a larger perspective by combining both labor market and household decision making together. It is often observed that women, prioritizing their families over their careers, settle for less paying and less demanding job profiles. This leads to gender wage gap even if the employers do not discriminate between male and female employees. We argue that women may make such choices in presence of patriarchal social norms, which see household chores as the primary duty of women. Our theoretical model predicts that women coming from families with stronger patriarchal values are more likely to accept less paying (and less demanding) jobs in the labor market than the women from liberal families. Our empirical section that uses a nationally representative survey data from India provides support for our theoretical predictions. Our results are robust to different measures of patriarchal culture. We also show that the marginal effect of patriarchy on women's wage varies across occupations and places of residence.

Suggested Citation

  • Anirban Mukherjee & Sukanya Sarkhel, 2025. "Patriarchal norms and women's labor market outcomes," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 747-774, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:29:y:2025:i:2:p:747-774
    DOI: 10.1111/rode.13145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13145
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rode.13145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:29:y:2025:i:2:p:747-774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.