IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v28y2024i4p2105-2120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban strategy in an era of public policy assessment: Beyond the methodological divide

Author

Listed:
  • Nestor Garza
  • Jennifer Garza

Abstract

This article presents the one‐sided intellectual influence of Economics on Urban Studies & Planning, the case of two social science disciplines with different epistemologies and approaches to policy advice. Subsequently, it presents the emergence of the so‐called evidence based policy (EBP) approach in Economics, comprising experimental (randomized control trial) and quasi‐experimental (difference‐in‐differences and propensity score matching) methods. The article shows that even though EBP claims to be exempt from normative/political, and even theoretical, considerations, it builds upon two features of neoclassical economics: sufficiency and separability. These conditions comprise its normative neoclassical theory background. We discuss the neoliberal turn in development narratives and their influence on urban planning, which coincides with the emergence of EBP. We analyze some EBP examples in the urban planning scholarship.

Suggested Citation

  • Nestor Garza & Jennifer Garza, 2024. "Urban strategy in an era of public policy assessment: Beyond the methodological divide," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 2105-2120, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:28:y:2024:i:4:p:2105-2120
    DOI: 10.1111/rode.13017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13017
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rode.13017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:28:y:2024:i:4:p:2105-2120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.