IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/randje/v47y2016i1p207-236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health information technology and patient outcomes: the role of information and labor coordination

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey S. McCullough
  • Stephen T. Parente
  • Robert Town

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey S. McCullough & Stephen T. Parente & Robert Town, 2016. "Health information technology and patient outcomes: the role of information and labor coordination," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 47(1), pages 207-236, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:randje:v:47:y:2016:i:1:p:207-236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/rand.2016.47.issue-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ari Bronsoler & Joseph Doyle & John Van Reenen, 2021. "The impact of healthcare IT on clinical quality, productivity and workers," CEP Discussion Papers dp1801, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Muhammad Zia Hydari & Rahul Telang & William M. Marella, 2019. "Saving Patient Ryan—Can Advanced Electronic Medical Records Make Patient Care Safer?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2041-2059, May.
    3. Böckerman, Petri & Laine, Liisa T. & Nurminen, Mikko & Saxell, Tanja, 2020. "Information Integration, Coordination Failures, and Quality of Prescribing," Working Papers 135, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    4. Brad N. Greenwood & Kartik K. Ganju & Corey M. Angst, 2019. "How Does the Implementation of Enterprise Information Systems Affect a Professional’s Mobility? An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 563-594, June.
    5. Lucy Xiaolu Wang, 2021. "The complementarity of drug monitoring programs and health IT for reducing opioid‐related mortality and morbidity," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(9), pages 2026-2046, September.
    6. Kartik K. Ganju & Hilal Atasoy & Paul A. Pavlou, 2022. "Do Electronic Health Record Systems Increase Medicare Reimbursements? The Moderating Effect of the Recovery Audit Program," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2889-2913, April.
    7. Ari Bronsoler & John Van Reenen & Joseph Doyle, 2022. "The Impact of Health Information and Communication Technology on Clinical Quality, Productivity, and Workers," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 23-46, August.
    8. Böckerman, Petri & Kortelainen, Mika & Laine, Liisa T. & Nurminen, Mikko & Saxell, Tanja, 2019. "Digital Waste? Unintended Consequences of Health Information Technology," Working Papers 117, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    9. Yanfei Wang, 2022. "Competition And Multilevel Technology Adoption: A Dynamic Analysis Of Electronic Medical Records Adoption In U.S. Hospitals," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(3), pages 1357-1395, August.
    10. Hilal Atasoy & Pei-yu Chen & Kartik Ganju, 2018. "The Spillover Effects of Health IT Investments on Regional Healthcare Costs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2515-2534, June.
    11. Gautam Gowrisankaran & Keith A. Joiner & Jianjing Lin, 2016. "How do Hospitals Respond to Payment Incentives?," NBER Working Papers 22873, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Diwas KC & TI Tongil Kim & Jiayi Liu, 2022. "Electronic prescription monitoring and the opioid epidemic," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(11), pages 4057-4074, November.
    13. Seth Freedman & Noah Hammarlund, 2019. "Electronic medical records and medical procedure choice: Evidence from cesarean sections," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(10), pages 1179-1193, October.
    14. Abhay Nath Mishra & Youyou Tao & Mark Keil & Jeong-ha (Cath) Oh, 2022. "Functional IT Complementarity and Hospital Performance in the United States: A Longitudinal Investigation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 55-75, March.
    15. Kim, Jounghyeon & McCullough, Jeffrey S. & Lee, Jinhyung, 2022. "Do liquidity constraints affect the investment decisions of California hospitals?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:randje:v:47:y:2016:i:1:p:207-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/randdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.