IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/pstrev/v4y2006i1p48-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politics and Mass Media: A Response to John Street

Author

Listed:
  • John Corner
  • Piers Robinson

Abstract

This short article is a response to an overview of research on media‐political relations written by John Street and published in the Political Studies Review in 2005. The usefulness of the exercise is recognised but issue is taken both with the organising concepts of Street's account and the way he excludes a significant body of research from his assessment, raising questions about his characterisation of the field under scrutiny. A case is made for assessing the tensions and the varieties of work in this broad area by the use of other categories, including the play‐off between media‐centric and politics‐centric accounts, the continuing strand of work informed by critical theory and the sheer variety of the topics upon which researchers have chosen to focus as a way into a broader agenda. The importance of work engaging with issues at an international level is emphasised together with the value of new comparative studies. In conclusion, the state of the area is judged more positively than in Street's assessment. Questions of power are argued to be the principal point at issue in comparing research approaches and the need for further explicitness and clarity here is noted.

Suggested Citation

  • John Corner & Piers Robinson, 2006. "Politics and Mass Media: A Response to John Street," Political Studies Review, Political Studies Association, vol. 4(1), pages 48-54, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:pstrev:v:4:y:2006:i:1:p:48-54
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-9299.2006.00035.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9299.2006.00035.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1478-9299.2006.00035.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:pstrev:v:4:y:2006:i:1:p:48-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1478-9299 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.